Department of English

Latest happenings in the GWU English Department


August 27th, 2008

A Special Alumni Event

Please join the English Department for a panel discussion on “Literature in a Global Age,” the past and future of writing in English.

A panel of authors and critics will lead a lively discussion of literature familiar and new, exploring the art that happens when cultures meet — and clash. The panel will feature faculty from the Department of English (including Thomas Mallon, Faye Moskowitz, Judith Plotz, and H. G. Carrillo) as well as renowned Scots-Asian writer Suhayl Saadi, our British Council Writer in Residence for 2008-09.

The panel is followed by a dessert reception and is a special alumni event. All current GW students are welcome as well. Registration here.

Here is some information about each confirmed presenter.

1. Scots-Asian novelist Suhayl Saadi is the author of Psychorag, a powerful account of a troubled Pakistani past set in contemporary Glasgow. A writer known for his rhythmic, inventive style, Saadi is the GW-British Council Writer in Residence. He is the author of many short stories, plays and a poems as well as this novel.

2. Thomas Mallon is a world renowned novelist and critic. A resident of Foggy Bottom, he teaches creative writing at GW. His novels have been widely translated, and include: Fellow Travelers; Henry and Clara; Stolen Words, Dewey Defeats Truman; Mrs. Paine’s Garage; Bandbox; and Arts and Sciences. He has also written for GQ, The New Yorker, The New York Times Magazine, The Atlantic Monthly, and Harper’s.

3. Jennifer James is an associate professor of English at GW. She teaches nineteenth century and African American literature. She has just published A Freedom Bought with Blood: African American War Literature, the Civil War-World War II.

4. Robert McRuer is the award-winning author of Crip Theory and The Queer Renaissance. His current work examines disability within an international perspective. He is an associate professor of English.

5. Faye Moskowitz is the former chair of the English Department, where she now teaches creative writing and Jewish American literature. Among her best known works are: Whoever Finds This: I Love You; And the Bridge is Love; and Peace in the House.

6. Judith Plotz teaches children’s literature, nineteenth century literature, and postcolonial literature. She is one of the most beloved professors in the English department and former department chair. Her most recent book is Romanticism and the Vocation of Childhood.

7. Tara Wallace is an associate professor of English and the associate dean of graduate studies at GW. A specialist in eighteenth century literature and a scholar of Jane Austen, she has just completed a book entitled Imperial Characters: Home and Periphery in Eighteenth-Century Literature.

8. H. G. Carrillo teaches creative writing at GW. His debut novel, Losing My Espanish, is a literary tour de force. He is the author of many short stories as well.


August 25th, 2008

The first Wang Visiting Professor in Contemporary English Literature will be Edward P. Jones, an African American author of world fame.

A DC resident, Mr. Jones won the Pulitzer Prize for Fiction in 2004 for his stunning novel The Known World. Set in rural Virginia before the Civil War, this vividly imagined and beautifully composed book centers around a plantation where a freed slave has purchased slaves of his own. The Known World is an emotionally wrenching and complex meditation upon racism, humanity, memory, and the power of art. Mr. Jones is also the author two collections of short stories set in Washington DC, Lost in the City (2004, winner of the PEN/Hemingway Award) and All Aunt Hagar’s Children (2006). Mr. Jones has been awarded numerous other literary prizes as well as a MacArthur Fellowship.

More information on Jones (including a short but thorough bio) can be found here.

Mr. Jones will be in residence during the spring semester of 2009. He will teach an advanced creative writing course, lead a literary reading group for undergraduates, and give at least one public reading.

Created through the generosity of Albert Wang, the Wang Visiting Professor in Contemporary Literature allows the Department of English in the Columbian College of Arts and Sciences to bring to campus a prominent scholar or author for a residency of at least a semester. In honor of our home in Washington, DC, and in recognition of the strengths and mission of GW’s English Department, the emphasis of this author’s work will typically be on literature within a cosmopolitan and international context. Literary achievement of the highest caliber, Edward P. Jones’s work fits this description admirably. We are honored to have him at GW.


July 29th, 2008

For reasons that will become more clear very soon, may we suggest that you add to your summer reading list a work by Edward P. Jones? Perhaps his Pulitzer Prize winning novel The Known World? Or maybe his breathtaking collection of stories All Aunt Hagar’s Children?

These are books that are well worth your time … but keep checking this blog, and you’ll see why we are recommending some time with Mr. Jones this August.


June 24th, 2008

We are very pleased to have Rajiv Menon join us this fall as the second Communications Liaison, an undergraduate internship position charged with disseminating news about the department and fostering a better sense of community among our majors. I asked Rajiv to compose a short paragraph of introduction, and this is what he offered:

I’m currently a rising junior majoring in English and International Affairs. I am originally from Houston, and though I was originally attracted to GW for the Elliott school, after taking a few classes in the English department, I was sure that English was the right path for me. I’ve greatly enjoyed my experience with GW’s English department and I’m happy that I have the opportunity to pursue my interests in Postcolonial and Asian American literature. I’ve really happy with the sense of community with this department, and I look forward to working as the communications liaison.


Welcome, Rajiv. We all look forward to working with you in the year ahead!


June 23rd, 2008

Yes, I know: it’s summer, and most of us have turned our brains off (I am just back from a family vacation at Disney World, and if that doesn’t constitute adequate proof of cranial de-activation, I do not know what would). Here, though, is some exciting news, courtesy of Cathy Eisenhower at the Gelman Library: the MLA database that we all know, use, and adore will contain article-level records soon.

OK, you may whisper your small “yahoo” and go back to aestivating.


October 16th, 2007

I met last week with the staff of GW’s Advancement office to speak about projects with which they might assist the English Department in fundraising. I was surprised to learn that most of what we seek is so modest that donors probably would not be that interested: significant gifts are those above $25,000. As an English major I can say only “!” I’m seldom at a loss for words, but that revelation left me speechless.

So apparently my department comes cheap. If you are reading this, have a kind heart and a love of culture and a wallet that has cash or even a credit card in it, here are some of the requests I made to Advancement on behalf of my colleagues.

  • A research fund so that faculty can travel to the archives they need to conduct their work. We work on projects as diverse as the life of Willa Cather and illustrations of incubi in medieval manuscripts. What these projects have in common (besides their ambition) is that the primary materials are housed in distant libraries, and a scholar’s salary seldom allows for extended visits.
  • A once a year, major lecture on Shakespeare. The lecture would be given by a scholar known for path breaking work. The talk would be for current undergraduates, regardless of major, and would be an event that we’d invite our alumni to attend each year to catch up with us.
  • Better support for our creative writing reading series. We’ve accomplished much on a shoestring budget; we could accomplish so much more on a more ample one.
  • A permanent source of support for our GW-British Council Writer in Residence. Currently we have only three years worth of funding.
  • Renovation of our physical space. As those of you who have visited our departmental offices know, we do a lot with the shabby chic aesthetic. Still, it would be conducive to a better sense of community to have a functioning lounge with a couch (shouldn’t every English major have access to a couch to crash upon and read Chaucer so that professors can wander by and strike up life changing conversations? That’s what I thought college was all about). We’d like a better place for faculty, graduate students, and undergraduates to congregate for informal conversation.
  • Some funds to have a yearly series of talks that would give our majors a better feel for the contours of the field. We’d love to feature some of our alumni in it.
  • More ambitiously, we would like to hire a faculty member who specializes in Jewish American Literature. We are fortunate to have Faye Moskowitz on our staff, but we would like to build on the strengths that she gives us.
  • We would also like to hire another Shakespeare specialist, and to create more full time positions for creative writers.
  • The department chair would also like to fund an annual trip for him and his family to Bermuda. However, we leave that one under “dreams best left unfulfilled for legal and ethical reasons.”

If you are interested in supporting anything on this list — or have ideas of your own — please don’t hesitate to contact me [chair @ gwu.edu] Please consider contributing via this link and designating your donation for the ENGLISH DEPARTMENT (scroll down the long list to check the box marked “Other” and then type in ENGLISH).


August 29th, 2007

In partnership with the Folger Shakespeare Library, the George Washington University is pleased to offer a new seminar on Books and Early Modern Culture.

The seminar is a one of a kind experience, offering undergraduates the chance to have reader’s privileges at the library and to utilize its world famous collection of Renaissance books.

The seminar will be launched this fall, and we hope to offer it every year henceforth for a select number of ambitious students. We hope they will find it a once in a lifetime experience that will deepen their knowledge and open new horizons.

——————–
ENGL/HIST 701.80: Folger-GW Undergraduate Research Seminar
Books and Early Modern Culture
Folger Shakespeare Library, Deck A Seminar Room

Dr. Sarah Werner

Course description
The purpose of this course is to introduce students to the history of books by focusing on books and early modern culture. By learning about how books were made and how books were used, students will gain a clearer appreciation of how early modern culture was shaped by and was a shaping force in the development of books. The archival skills students learn in conducting this research will serve them in future research projects, and their understanding of the sociology of books will refine their understanding of the early modern period and the roles that books played in later periods.

Course thematics
As we will discuss during this course, the study of books and book history can be divided into three approaches: 1) books as objects; 2) books as a societal force; and 3) books as vehicles for text. This class will draw on each of these approaches during the semester. We will begin with an exploration of books as physical objects: how they were made and what we can learn from their physical presence. By learning about the physical labor that went into making books—how they were printed, how they were assembled, how they were bound—we will learn to recognize the physical traces that can lead us to a new understanding of how a particular book was used, what its impact might have been, and how it shapes the text it contains. After this introduction to books as objects, we will move on to examine the role that books played in early modern culture and the processes by which they were made available. Our examination will be guided by Robert Darnton’s notion of a “communication circuit” and will focus, in turn, on the relationships between printers, book sellers, readers, and authors. We will look at the processes by which the power of print has been harnessed and censored, explore how the growth of printed books shaped new audiences of readers, and consider what authorship meant during the early modern period. Two sessions will focus on subjects that are particularly fruitful in exploring the relationship between print and culture: Shakespeare and early modern Bibles. The final section of our course will consider books as vehicles for text. In some ways the opposite approach of focusing exclusively on the book as a material object, this approach will consider how books transmit (and shape) texts. We will use Gerard Genette’s notion of “paratext” to think about how the liminal shapes a text’s meaning, and will use Randall McLeod’s notion of “transformission” to explore how the medium of print and reproduction alters textual meaning. We will also explore the process of editing texts, and interrogate how early modern texts are reshaped as modern books by studying some of the theories behind modern editing and by working on our own transcriptions and studying instances of modern editions.

Grades
There will be five written papers assigned during this course, making up 90% of your final grade for this course (descriptions of the assignments and their percentage of the final grade are provided on the last page of this syllabus). Students will not be expected to write a long research paper for this course, although they will be able to use the skills and information they learn in this course to help them write research papers in other courses. Those students who will be writing theses in the spring semester will find that this course gives them a framework for beginning that research in the Folger’s collection. Late papers will not be accepted; should you anticipate a problem in meeting a deadline, you need to talk to me in advance of the deadline itself.

The remaining 10% of your final grade will be based on your class participation and the occasional archival exercises assigned during class. You must come to each and every class prepared for that day’s discussion. Because we meet only once a week, missing even one session will hinder your preparedness for the assignments and will stand in the way of your developing knowledge about early modern books.

Readings
Readings marked on the syllabus with an asterisk (*) are the primary readings for that day; other readings listed should be read as your time and interest allows. Most of the readings will be placed on reserve in Gelman’s library and placed on our course shelves at the Folger. There are two books you are responsible for either buying or checking out of one of the consortium libraries: Warren Chappell and Robert Bringhurst, A Short History of the Printed Word, Second Edition, Revised and Updated (Point Roberts, WA: Hartley and Marks, 1999); and Philip Gaskell, A New Introduction to Bibliography (Oxford: Clarendon P, 1972).

You will notice that the readings specified on the syllabus below consist nearly entirely of modern books about early modern books and book history. We will be working with early modern books in class and outside of class, and you will be provided with a bibliography of the books we have consulted in class. Students are always welcome to bring into the classroom particular books that they are interested in and would like to discuss. And students should avail themselves of the resources in the Folger, both of our collection of rare materials, but also of our range of experts in the field. The library’s curators and staff will help you find your way through our collection.

Finally, readings in the course will be supplemented by appearances of the guest faculty, identified on the syllabus below, speaking on a range of topics such as using bibliographic evidence to date materials, to the history of book illustration, to the rise of 18th-century biblical satire and the circulation of 19th-century gift books.

The history of books is a broad and fascinating area of research. There are many fields of inquiry that this course will not address: libraries, censorship, mapmaking, and bindings are just a few of the topics that could be added to an exploration of early modern culture and books. But this course will model a variety of approaches to the field and will give students a range of tools that they can use in their independent research and in future courses.

September 7: Orientation

Advance Reading: Bradin Cormack and Carlo Mazzio, “Use, Misuse and the Making of Book Theory: 1500-1700” in Book Use, Book Theory: 1500-1700, eds Cormack and Mazzio (Chicago: U Chicago Library, 2005), 1-37.

Tour of Library with Betsy Walsh, Head of Reader Services, explanation of Library procedures, and presentation on book handling practices with Frank Mowery, Head of Conservation

September 14: Preface: What is book history?

* Robert Darnton, “What is the History of Books?” in The Kiss of Lamourette: Reflections in Cultural History (New York & London: Norton, 1990), 107-35. [originally published in Daedalus 111:3 (1982): 65-83.]
* D.F. McKenzie, “The Book as an Expressive Form” in Bibliography and the Sociology of Texts (Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1999), 9-30. [originally given as a Panizzi lecture at the British Library, 1985]
* Roger Chartier, “Labourers and Voyagers: From the Text to the Reader” Diacritics 22:2 (Summer 1992): 49-61.
* Adrian Johns, “The Book of Nature and the Nature of the Book” in The Nature of the Book: Print and Knowledge in the Making (Chicago: U Chicago P, 1998), 1-57 (esp. 1-40).

Book display with Dr Steven Galbraith, Curator of Books
Tour of Conservation lab

September 21: Introduction: Incunabula: the first printed books

* Warren Chappell and Robert Bringhurst, “Chapter 1: Prologue to Discovery” and “Chapter 4: Incunabula: 1440-1500” in A Short History of the Printed Word, Second Edition, Revised and Updated (Point Roberts, WA: Hartley and Marks, 1999), 3-21 and 65-92.
* Christopher de Hamel, “The Gutenberg Bible” in The Book: A History of The Bible (London: Phaidon, 2001), 190-215.
John L. Flood, “‘Volentes sibi comparare infrascriptos libros impressos …’: Printed Books as a Commercial Commodity in the Fifteenth Century” in Incunabula and Their Readers: Printing, Selling and Using Books in the Fifteenth Century, ed. Kristian Jensen (London: British Library, 2003), 139-52.
Lucien Febvre and Henri-Jean Martin, “Preliminaries: The Introduction of Paper into Europe” in The Coming of the Book: The Impact of Printing 1450-1800, trans. David Gerard (London and New York: Verso, 1976), 29-54. [orig. L’Apparition du livre, 1958]

Guest faculty: Steve Galbraith: Incunabula from the Folger’s collection

view in class: The Making of a Renaissance Book. Dir. Dana Atchely, prod. American Friends of the Plantin-Moretus Museum (Antwerp). 16 mm film, 22 min., 1969. Rereleased by Book Arts Press, VHS, 2000.

September 28: Part I: Books as objects: overview of physical aspects of early modern books

* Warren Chappell and Robert Bringhurst, “Chapter 3: Type: Cutting and Casting,” “Chapter 5: The Sixteenth Century,” and “Chapter 6: The Seventeenth Century” A Short History of the Printed Word, Second Edition, Revised and Updated (Point Roberts, WA: Hartley and Marks, 1999), 43-64, 93-122, and 123-57.
Stephen Orgel, “Textual Icons: Reading Early Modern Illustrations” in The Renaissance Computer: Knowledge, Technology in the First Age of Print, eds Neil Rhodes and Jonathan Sawday (London and New York: Routledge, 2000), 59-94.

Guest faculty: Dr Erin Blake, Curator of Art, Folger Shakespeare Library: Introduction to early modern book illustration

October 5: Books as objects: type and presses
Class to be held at Hill Press, with Steven Heaver

* Philip Gaskell, A New Introduction to Bibliography (Oxford: Clarendon P, 1972). “Composition” pp. 40-56; “Imposition” pp. 78-117 [on format, either Gaskell pp. 80-107 or Greetham pp. 112-36 (see below); but Gaskell pp. 109-117 regardless]; “Presswork” pp. 118-141 [skim pp. 118-24].
D. C. Greetham, “Making the Text: Bibliography of Printed Books” in Textual Scholarship: An Introduction (New York and London: Garland, 1994), 77-151, esp. 112-36 [as replacement for Gaskell on format, above]; “Describing the Text: Descriptive Bibliography” pp153-68

useful videos illustrating aspects of punchcutting, typecasting, and understanding format; these can be watched at the Folger, but are not required viewing:
From Punch to Printing Type: The Art and Craft of Hand Punchcutting and Typecasting, dir. Peter Herdrich, prod. Book Arts Press, 1985. VHS, 45 min.
The Anatomy of a Book, I: Format in the Hand-Press Period, dir. Peter Herdrich, written by Terry Belanger, prod. Viking Productions, distrib. Book Arts Press, 1991. VHS, 30 min.
How to Operate a Book, dir. Peter Herdrich, written by Terry Belanger and Gary Frost, prod. Book Arts Press, 1986. VHS 30 min.

October 12: Books as objects: vellum, paper, watermarks
Assignment due in class: Book history and your field

Guest faculty: Dr Carter Hailey, College of William and Mary: Using bibliographic evidence: collating, watermarks, ink

Philip Gaskell, “Paper” in A New Introduction to Bibliography (Oxford: Clarendon P, 1972), 57-77 (esp. 57-66).

October 19: Part II: Books and early modern culture: printing and selling

* Peter W. M. Blayney, “The Publication of Playbooks” in A New History of Early English Drama, eds John D. Cox and David Scott Kastan (New York: Columbia UP, 1997), 383-422.
* Alan B. Farmer and Zachary Lesser, “The Popularity of Playbooks Revisited,” Shakespeare Quarterly 56 (2005): 1-32.
* John Barnard, “Introduction” in The Cambridge History of the Book in Britain, Vol. IV: 1557-1695, eds John Barnard and D. F. McKenzie, with Maureen Bell (Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2002), 1-25.
Peter W. M. Blayney, “John Day and the Bookshop That Never Was” in Material London, ca. 1600, ed. Lena Cowen Orlin (Philadelphia: U Pennsylvania P, 2000), 322-43.
M. A. Shaaber, “The Meaning of the Imprint in Early Printed Books,” The Library 24 (1944): 120-41.

The debate between Blayney and Farmer and Lesser about playbook popularity continues in this series of responses:
Peter W. M. Blayney, “The Alleged Popularity of Playbooks,” Shakespeare Quarterly 56 (2005): 33-50.
Alan B. Farmer and Zachary Lesser, “Structures of Popularity in the Early Modern Book Trade,” Shakespeare Quarterly 56 (2005): 206-13.

Guest faculty: Professor Ann Hawkins, Texas Tech University: 19th-century giftbooks

October 26: Books and culture: Shakespeare

* Gary Taylor, “Making Meaning Marketing Shakespeare 1623” in From Performance to Print in Shakespeare’s England, eds Peter Holland and Stephen Orgel (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2006), 55-72.
* David Scott Kastan, “From Contemporary to Classic; Or, Textual Healing” in Shakespeare and the Book (Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2001), 79-110.
* Thomas L. Berger, “‘Opening Titles Miscreate’: Some Observations on the Titling of Shakespeare’s ‘Works’” in The Margins of the Text, ed. D. C. Greetham (Ann Arbor: U Michigan P, 1997), 155-72.

November 2: Books and early modern culture: readers
Assignment due in class: Your book’s readers

* Robert Darnton, “First Steps Toward a History of Reading” in The Kiss of Lamourette: Reflections in Cultural History (New York and London: Norton, 1990), 154-87. [orig. Australian Journal of French Studies 23 (1986): 5-30.]
* Heidi Brayman Hackel, “The ‘Great Variety’ of Readers and Early Modern Reading Practices” in A Companion to Shakespeare, ed. David Scott Kastan (Oxford: Blackwell, 1999), 139-57.
* William H. Sherman, “What Did Renaissance Readers Write in Their Books?” in Books and Readers in Early Modern England: Material Studies, eds Jennifer Andersen and Elizabeth Sauer (Philadelphia: U Pennsylvania P, 2002), 119-37.
Heidi Brayman Hackel, “Consuming Readers: Ladies, Lapdogs, and Libraries” in Reading Material in Early Modern England: Print, Gender, and Literacy (Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2005), 196-255.

Guest faculty: Dr Heather Wolfe, Curator of Manuscripts, Folger Shakespeare Library: Manuscript and print culture: Mary Wroth

November 9: Books and early modern culture: Bibles and religion

Guest faculty: Professor Michael Suarez, S.J., Fordham and Oxford

* Christopher de Hamel, “Bibles of the Protestant Reformation” in The Book: A History of The Bible (London: Phaidon, 2001), 216-45.
* B. J. McMullin, “The Bible Trade” in The Cambridge History of the Book in Britain, Volume IV: 1557-1695, eds John Barnard and D. F. McKenzie (Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2002), 455-73.
* Peter Stallybrass, “Books and Scrolls: Navigating the Bible” in Books and Readers in Early Modern England: Material Studies, eds Jennifer Andersen and Elizabeth Sauer (Philadelphia: U Pennsylvania P, 2002), 42-79.
Jean-François Gilmont, “Protestant Reformations and Reading” in A History of Reading in the West, eds Guglielmo Cavallo and Roger Chartier, trans. Lydia G. Cochrane (Amherst: U Massachusetts P, 1999), 213-37.
Dominique Julia, “Reading and the Counter-Reformation” in A History of Reading in the West, eds Guglielmo Cavallo and Roger Chartier, trans. Lydia G. Cochrane (Amherst: U Massachusetts P, 1999), 238-68.

November 16: Books and early modern culture: authors
Assignment due in class: Your book’s author

* Michel Foucault, “What is an Author?” in Textual Strategies: Perspectives in Post-Structuralist Criticism, ed. Josué V. Harari (Ithaca, NY: Cornell UP, 1979), 141-60.
* Roger Chartier, “Figures of the Author” in The Order of Books: Readers, Authors, and Libraries in Europe between the Fourteenth and Eighteenth Centuries, trans. Lydia G. Cochrane (Cambridge, UK: Polity P, 1994), 25-60.
* Maureen Bell, “Women Writing and Women Written” in The Cambridge History of the Book in Britain, Volume IV: 1557-1695, eds John Barnard and D. F. McKenzie, with Maureen Bell (Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2002), 431-51.
Wendy Wall, “Dancing in a Net: The Problems of Female Authorship” in The Imprint of Gender: Authorship and Publication in the English Renaissance (Ithaca and London: Cornell UP, 1993), 279-340.

Guest faculty: Professor Leah Chang, The George Washington University: Louise Labé and female authorship

November 21, 5:00 pm: Assignment due: Your book’s biography

November 23: NO CLASS—Thanksgiving Break

November 30: Part III: Books as vehicles for text: paratext and “transformission”

* Gerard Genette, “Introduction” in Paratexts: Thresholds of Interpretation, trans. Jane E. Lewin (Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1997; orig. Seuils 1987), 1-15.
* Evelyn B. Tribble, “Authority, Control, Community: The English Printed Bible Page from Tyndale to the Authorized Version” in Margins and Marginality: The Printed Page in Early Modern England (Charlottesville and London: University Press of Virginia, 1993), 11-56.
* Random Clod [pseud. Randall McLeod], “Information upon Information” TEXT 5 (1991): 241-81.
Randall Anderson, “The Rhetoric of Paratext in Early Printed Books” in The Cambridge History of the Book in Britain, Volume IV: 1557-1695, eds John Barnard and D. F. McKenzie (Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2002), 636-44.
Gabriel Egan, “‘As it was, is, or will be played’: Title-pages and the Theatre Industry to 1610” in From Performance to Print in Shakespeare’s England, eds Peter Holland and Stephen Orgel (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2006), 92-110.
Zachary Lesser, “Typographic Nostalgia: Play-Reading, Popularity, and the Meanings of Black Letter” in The Book of the Play: Playwrights, Stationers, and Readers in Early Modern England, ed. Marta Straznicky (Amherst and Boston: U Massachusetts P, 2006), 99-126.

December 7: Books as vehicles: editing early modern texts

* Robert D. Hume, “The Aims and Uses of ‘Textual Studies’” PBSA 99:2 (2005): 197-230.
* Stephen Orgel, “What Is a Text?” and “What Is an Editor?” in The Authentic Shakespeare and Other Problems of the Early Modern Stage (New York and London: Routledge, 2002), 1-6 and 15-20. [orig. Research Opportunities in Renaissance Drama 24 (1981) and Shakespeare Studies 24 (1996)]
* Gary Taylor, “The Renaissance and the End of Editing” in Palimpsest: Editorial Theory in the Humanities, eds George Bornstein and Ralph G. Williams (Ann Arbor: U Michigan P, 1993), 121-49.

December 14, 5:00 pm: Assignment due: Early modern texts as modern books

Assignment Descriptions: (longer guidelines will be distributed during the semester)

For all the assignments below, you will want to use an early modern book of your choice (assuming that it is in the Folger collection and with which you can work closely). Your faculty advisor and the staff at the Library (especially Dr Werner) can help you find appropriate books to examine. You may use the same book for all assignments, or you may switch books during the semester. If done properly, the assignments on the book’s readers and author should be able to be incorporated into writing the book’s biography.

Late papers will not be accepted; should you anticipate a problem in meeting a deadline, you need to talk to me in advance of the deadline itself.

Your field and book history (500-800 words; Due October 12; 10% of final grade):
Identify some aspect of book history that is important for your research or primary field of interest. You do not need to know the answers to your queries, only to identify them as areas of interest and to explain why they are of interest.

Your book’s readers (1000-1500 words; Due November 2; 10% of final grade):
Where are the signs of a reader in your book? What are those signs? Are they signs of a specific, individual reader, or are they signs of a projected audience? If both, what is the relationship between that specific reader and the imagined audience? What is the relationship between the author and the reader(s)? Is there evidence of the book having been actually read?

Your book’s author (1000-1500 words; Due November 16; 10% of final grade):
How does your book identify and construct its author(s)? Is there a name on the titlepage? Is it pseudonymous? Anonymous? Is the author identified in other ways, such as through prefatory materials, or the use of the first person in the text?

Your book’s biography (2000-2500 words; Due November 21; 30% of final grade):
Write the biography of your book. Start from the book’s creation (who wrote it, who put up the money for its publication, who printed it) and move on through the history of the book (where it was sold, which owners (if any) can be identified, what uses were made of the book, what changes were made to the book’s physical structure) on up to the present day (how did it come into the Folger’s collection, how is it catalogued). Depending on the popularity of your book, you could address familial relationships (reprints, subsequent early modern editions, subsequent editions), travel history (translations), etc.

Early modern texts as modern books (2000-2500 words [Part Two]; Due December 14; 30% of final grade):
Part One: Transcribe the title page and the first page of text of one of the early modern texts central to your research;
Part Two: Choose one of the two options below:
a) Find a modern (19th, 20th, or 21st century) edition of your book (in either codex or hypertext form) and describe how that book constructs the text (its use, its readers, etc.).
b) Compare your book with its equivalent on microfilm or EEBO and describe how the copy differs from the original (how is the experience of reading them different, what is the difference between the two impressions and the two material objects, what is lost and/or what is gained by reading the text in this other form?).


July 24th, 2007

English Departmental Annual Report Form (AY 06-07)
Prepared by Jeffrey J. Cohen, Chair

Major Accomplishments

This academic year marked a profound moment of change for the English Department. Senior faculty who had long run the department (and had run it very well) saw the results of some canny hiring in the past as new faculty stepped into administrative roles. This was my first year as department chair. Gayle Wald became deputy chair and leader of the Planning and Development Committee. Gil Harris assumed directorship of the departmental honors program. Patty Chu became our Director of Undergraduate Advising, while Tara Wallace became Director of Graduate Studies. Every important position related to the governance of our department changed hands.

I want to stress that our department was in excellent shape when I assumed its helm: eight years of leadership by Faye Moskowitz ensured that solid state. No crisis was looming. Yet the change in administration has been energizing, encouraging us all to think deeply about our pedagogical mission; our excellence in research; our burgeoning national reputation; our shared values and sense of intellectual community.

Given that so many of us were new to our positions, our communal goals were relatively modest in 2006-07. We focused upon learning the ropes of departmental governance and university administration. All of the following goals, however, were accomplished:

  • Simplify the undergraduate major and render its requirements more transparent and commonsensical. The CCAS curriculum committee has approved our changes.
  • Change the annual faculty evaluation process to render it as prospective as it is retrospective (previously, it had been focused upon past accomplishment to the detriment of future ambition).
  • Work with the Director of Creative Writing to establish the new British Council Writer in Residence for Fall 07. We are off to a brilliant start, having secured Nadeem Aslam, a novelist of international renown, as our visitor for October 2007. (Aslam is the author of the award winning novel Maps for Lost Lovers, a heartbreaking account of life among Pakistani immigrants in England). This will be the first year of a three-year pilot program. We have very high hopes for it, not only as a bridge between our creative writing and literature programs but as a reputation building event that will also garner alumni interest.
  • Begin outreach to alumni through a personal letter and the creation of the “Featured Alumni” section for our blog.
  • Complete the transition of our department from its service orientation to an embrace at every level of a research-active mission that reaches from our freshman seminars to our introductory courses to our graduate program. This transformation has meant changing the membership of most of our departmental committees; reordering our priorities in allocating funding and material resources; establishing a new gateway to the major course that will also intensely train and mentor graduate students while demonstrating what the study of literature in a global age should be (the new English 40W). The new gateway course was funded in part by our successful grant application to the Writing Program ($5K for reinventing a large course as writing intensive).
  • Support the mission of the Writing in the Disciplines (WID) initiative and the educational mission of CCAS by making all our lower level and survey courses WID courses, and making the majority of our upper level courses WID. We are happy to say that, unlike any other department, the majority of our courses are now WID.
  • Increase the faculty mentoring of graduate students through the introduction of early teaching experiences and more use of GTAs in the literature classroom.
  • Introduce more rigour as well as efficiency to the graduate program.
  • Foster our ties to the Folger Shakespeare Library through the establishment of a first in the nation undergraduate research course that allows reader privileges there. The course will meet for the first time in Fall 2007, and will introduce students to the handling and use of books dating back to the Renaissance. We see this seminar as a first step towards a deep alliance between our department and the Folger, a research library like no other and an underutilized resource for both our undergraduates and graduate students.
  • Hire a world-class writer focused upon the Latino experience (the novelist Herman Carrillo).
  • Hire a world-class medievalist whose focus on medieval literature in global terms will resonate with our burgeoning strengths (Jonathan Hsy).
  • Begin to make the English Department an intellectual community welcoming other scholars in CCAS — especially young scholars whose departments are not as research active — via our focus upon global humanities past and present. This fostering of intramural community has been done by the creation of a colloquium and lecture series.
  • Accomplish a complete revision of our graduate curriculum focusing upon the three areas of our strength: Medieval/Early Modern; Postcolonial; and Nineteenth Century. This spring the revised Medieval/Early Modern curriculum was approved by the CCAS curriculum committee; it goes into effect next year. The two other areas will be submitted in the fall.
  • Establish a new university seminar to grow our strengths in early Europe and form more of a university community around the area. We submitted a successful proposal for a new seminar focused upon Medieval and Early Modern Europe within a global frame. The seminar will begin to meet in Fall 2007. It has support from scholars at Georgetown, U Maryland, American, and George Mason, as well as the Shakespeare Theatre. The latter alliance is a first step towards making the forum DC-wide and not limited only to universities. We’d like to see more of our research brought into the public sphere; the Shakespeare Theatre seems the logical place to start, since they stage so much work by Shakespeare and have so effectively marketed themselves as a leading DC cultural institution.
  • Have faculty apply for prestigious research grants.

Major Challenges & Obstacles
Our greatest obstacle is our meager budget. We do not have enough money in it to cover our required contributions towards faculty travel, let alone sponsor events of any kind (lectures, round table discussions, workshops). It is very difficult to be ambitious when your fund balance is not zero but negative within a few months of the fiscal year beginning. I believe that those who pay the highest price for this lack of funds are our undergraduates: we are not very good at fostering their sense that they belong to an intellectual community extending outside of the classroom, mainly because we can’t afford to stage any events that draw them together with us. American University, for example, is much better at accomplishing this goal through their speaker series funding.

Another challenge is the danger of inertia. Our department is for the most part a collegial place: faculty gripes are few. Though it could be argued that what isn’t broken ought not to be tampered with, as chair I have been arguing just the opposite: now, from a tranquil vantage, is the time to reconsider what we do and how we do it. Now is the time to think seriously about how to maintain the tremendous growth in our national reputation and our status as one of the most research active departments in CCAS. Now is the time to think seriously about who we want to be five and even ten years from this moment.

Goals for 07 – 08
We will continue working on many of the goals stated above for next year. Our primary focus will be upon enriching the intellectual life of our undergraduates via a thorough revision of our undergraduate curriculum, the establishment of extracurricular opportunities for undergrads to learn about the field and its scholars, and the growth of our ties to DC institutions like the Folger and the National Shakespeare Theatre. I also intend to have us work more closely with other area English Departments, especially Georgetown, American, and Maryland: at this point, we function in relative isolation from the other educational institutions with whom we share a city.

Our biggest commitment in terms of faculty energy will be the revision of the undergraduate curriculum, a list of courses that has not been touched in more than decade. In the fall we have serious and far-ranging discussions about our department’s identity vis à vis our desire to move towards a more globalized approach to literature in English. Though a commitment to that movement is already evident in the courses we teach as special topics, moving much of this material from sidelines to center will not be uncontroversial. It will, however, transform our undergraduate program of study into one of the most ambitious in the nation, and place us (we are confident) on the leading edge of how literature is analyzed and understood today.


July 16th, 2007

The English Department cordially welcomes Steven Knapp as the new president of the George Washington University.

In case any readers need further proof of the many jobs open to English majors, we would like to point out that President Knapp is a scholar well published in both literature and critical theory. We also find it appropriate that his new house at 1925 F Street recently had a statue of the raven from Edgar Allen Poe’s poem placed upon the property. To those who like to declare that English majors will not someday rule the world (or at least the university), we answer “Nevermore!”



The GW English Blog

The GW English Blog will keep you up-to-date on news, events, and publications from the English Department of the George Washington University.

Categories



Contribute to GW English

Your generosity directly supports the English Department's research, teaching, and public events. Contributions from alumni and friends have enabled us to sponsor workshops for our students, host esteemed lecturers, and hold public readings by creative writers. Faculty have used funds from department supporters to complete books and bring new research into the classroom. Click here to donate, and be sure to specify "English Department."

We want to hear from you!

The English Department is only as strong as its community of faculty, staff, students, and alumni. Whether you are an undeclared freshman, a current English major, a graduate of the department, or simply an interested reader, we would love to hear from you. We're always looking for feedback -- and volunteers. Have an interesting story about the GW English Department? Share it with us. Have a question or suggestion? Don't hesitate to ask. Proud of your accomplishments as an alumni? We'll feature you in a post. Always wanted to work on a blog? Let us know.

Follow us on twitter


    About the College

    The Columbian College of Arts and Sciences is the cornerstone of The George Washington University's academic program, with over 40 departments and programs, from biology to dance, sociology to anthropology, museum studies to forensic sciences.

    Columbian Blogs

    Columbian College Blogs are meant to showcase the people behind the College and their doings.

    Links